What Goldman's revised forecast actually says

Goldman Sachs commodity analysts published a note on Sunday projecting that Brent crude will trade at roughly $90 per barrel in Q4 2026, up from a prior forecast of $80, according to a report by City A.M. The revision rests on two factors: a longer timeline for Gulf oil exports to normalise, now expected by end of June rather than mid-May, and an estimated 500,000 barrels per day of permanent "scarring" to Gulf production capacity.

The bank noted that the crisis had already cut oil inventories by up to 12 million barrels per day in April, as reported by City A.M. Brent crude jumped 2.1 per cent in early Monday trading to $107.50, putting the year-to-date gain at 78.5 per cent.

Since 17 April, when US-Iran peace talks initially stalled, prices have surged more than 20 per cent, according to the same report. The US naval blockade, enforced on 13 April, continues to restrict transit through the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which approximately 20 per cent of global oil supply passes, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

Longer-dated Brent futures tell a different story. December contracts were trading at roughly $84.80 per barrel, as reported by City A.M., suggesting the market expects prices to fall. Goldman's analysts attributed this to expectations of Hormuz reopening, which they said had "reduced the risk premium and led to destocking."

It is worth attaching caveats to the headline figure. Goldman's oil desk has a mixed forecasting record. In 2022, the bank projected Brent would reach $150 during the Russia-Ukraine supply shock; it peaked near $128 in March of that year before retreating sharply. In 2024, the bank's mid-year forecast of $86 proved closer to the mark, with Brent averaging around $82 across Q3 and Q4, according to ICE Futures data. The $90 Q4 target may prove conservative or generous depending on whether the Strait reopens.

Why Brent at $107 hits UK operators harder than the headline suggests

The spot price of Brent is not the number that appears on a UK business's energy bill, but it is the number that drives it. UK wholesale gas prices, benchmarked to the National Balancing Point, have tracked Brent's ascent closely. Commercial electricity contracts for delivery in Q3 2026 were quoted above £85 per MWh in late April, according to Cornwall Insight data, compared with approximately £55 per MWh six months earlier. Gas contracts have followed a similar trajectory.

For manufacturers, the pain is compounded. Input costs rise not only through direct energy bills but through freight surcharges, petrochemical feedstock prices, and supplier pass-throughs. Goldman's own analysts warned that the economic fallout from higher energy prices would be "greater than the headline price of oil suggested," citing the risk of product shortages, as reported by City A.M.

The Bank of England flagged energy-driven inflation as a key upside risk in its March 2026 Monetary Policy Report, noting that sustained oil prices above $100 could add 0.4 to 0.6 percentage points to CPI by Q3, according to the report's scenario analysis. The Office for National Statistics reported that producer input prices rose 4.2 per cent year-on-year in March, with petroleum products the single largest contributor.

For UK hospitality and transport operators, the squeeze is immediate. Diesel prices at the pump have risen above 160p per litre in many parts of England, according to RAC Fuel Watch data from late April, feeding directly into delivery costs and fleet operating expenses.

The 2022 parallel, and its limits

The last comparable energy shock hit UK SMEs in 2022, when the Russia-Ukraine conflict drove wholesale gas prices to record levels. The government responded with the Energy Bill Relief Scheme, capping unit rates for non-domestic customers from October 2022 to March 2023, followed by the less generous Energy Bills Discount Scheme.

Neither programme has a direct successor in place today. The Treasury has not announced equivalent support for the current spike, and the political appetite for broad-based energy subsidies appears limited given fiscal constraints. Businesses that survived 2022 by locking in fixed-rate contracts at post-crisis lows may find those contracts are now expiring into a far more expensive market.

The futures curve: a planning signal or a false comfort?

The Brent futures curve is in steep backwardation. Spot prices above $107 give way to December 2026 contracts near $85 and calendar-year 2027 strips closer to $78, according to ICE Futures Europe data from 28 April. On its face, this suggests the market expects a meaningful price decline over the next six to twelve months.

But backwardation is not a forecast. It reflects the cost of carry, current inventory tightness, and hedging flows as much as any consensus view on where prices will settle. In 2022, a similarly steep backwardation curve did precede a price decline, but the timing was difficult to predict and businesses that waited to hedge were caught out.

Goldman's analysts pointed to reports of an Iranian proposal, conveyed through Pakistani mediators, to extend the ceasefire and work toward a permanent solution, as reported by City A.M. Global equity markets rallied cautiously on the news. But Tehran has reportedly refused to discuss nuclear weapons until the US lifts the Hormuz blockade, and it remains unclear whether Washington will engage, with a situation room meeting on Iran expected on Monday.

The path from $107 to $85 requires either a diplomatic resolution or a significant demand response. Neither is assured on a fixed timeline.

What mid-market businesses should be doing now

The operational implications split into three time horizons.

Immediate: audit exposure

Finance directors should map total energy and fuel exposure across the business, including indirect costs embedded in supplier contracts and logistics agreements. Many mid-market firms discovered in 2022 that their true energy exposure was two to three times what their direct utility bills suggested, once freight, packaging, and raw material surcharges were included.

Short-term: reassess hedging and contracts

Fixed-price energy contracts that expire in the coming months will roll into significantly higher rates. Businesses with procurement flexibility should evaluate whether the futures curve offers a viable hedging entry point, bearing in mind that locking in at $85 on a December strip still represents a substantial increase on 2024 rates. Supplier contracts with fuel surcharge clauses should be reviewed; those without such clauses may need renegotiation.

Medium-term: pricing and demand planning

Sustained input cost inflation compresses margins unless it is passed through. Businesses in competitive consumer-facing sectors, particularly hospitality and retail, face the hardest trade-off. The 2022 experience showed that firms which adjusted pricing early and transparently fared better than those which absorbed costs and attempted to recover them later in a single large increase.

Goldman's revised forecast implies that even the bank's own analysts expect prices to retreat from current levels. But the gap between $107 today and $90 in Q4 is not a gap that closes on a schedule anyone can reliably predict. For UK operators, the prudent assumption is that energy costs remain elevated well into the second half of 2026, and planning should reflect that reality rather than the comfort of a downward-sloping futures curve.