Paramount Skydance has raised its bid for Warner Bros Discovery from $30 to $31 per share, forcing the board to reconsider its December agreement with Netflix
Netflix's competing offer values Warner Bros at $27.75 per share or roughly $82bn including debt, but would split the company into separate entities
Paramount has committed nearly $10bn in potential break-up fees and termination payments to stay in the bidding war
Warner Bros may be positioning for bids to reach $33 per share as it plays rival suitors against each other
Warner Bros Discovery has extracted exactly what it wanted: a bidding war. Paramount Skydance's decision to lift its offer from $30 to $31 per share represents the first official increase in a pursuit that has stretched on for months, forcing the board to acknowledge the revised proposal "could reasonably be expected to lead to a superior" outcome than its December agreement with Netflix. The question is whether this manoeuvre reflects confident dealmaking or the increasingly desperate calculations of a legacy media company watching its relevance drain away in the streaming era.
Corporate bidding war and media company negotiations
Warner Bros now finds itself in the enviable position of choosing between two radically different futures. The Netflix agreement, valued at $27.75 per share or roughly $82bn including debt (the equity portion sits considerably lower at around $35bn), would carve up the company like a Sunday roast. Netflix would acquire the profitable bits: the film division, streaming assets, and HBO.
What remains—traditional television networks and CNN—would spin off as an independent entity, left to fend for itself in a declining linear TV market. Paramount's offer, by contrast, proposes swallowing Warner Bros whole at $31 per share. The difference represents about $4bn in additional value to shareholders, hardly insignificant.
Enjoying this article?
Get stories like this in your inbox every week.
The price of poker chips
What's particularly striking about Paramount's revised bid is the extraordinary financial commitment required to stay in the game. The company has agreed to pay a $7bn break-up fee should the deal collapse, whilst also covering the $2.8bn termination payment Warner Bros owes Netflix under the December agreement. That's nearly $10bn in potential dead money before a single frame of content gets produced or streaming subscriber acquired.
For a company attempting to transform itself from mid-tier player into Hollywood heavyweight through acquisition rather than organic growth, these commitments raise uncomfortable questions about post-merger investment capacity.
Paramount Skydance, backed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison and run by his son David, may find itself owning a vast media empire with limited ammunition to compete against the war chests of Netflix and Disney. Netflix co-chief executive Ted Sarandos, speaking to the BBC before Paramount's increased offer emerged, described the competitive bidding as "part of the process" and "price-discovery". His studied nonchalance likely masks internal calculations about how high Netflix is willing to go for assets that would cement its dominance in premium content production.
Streaming media industry competition and consolidation
The company now has four days to respond with a counter-offer. The irony here is rich. Warner Bros spent decades as one of Hollywood's most powerful studios, churning out Batman franchises and prestige HBO dramas whilst its competitors scrambled. Its willingness to be dismembered or sold whole suggests management recognises the company lacks the scale to compete independently in a market where only the largest survive.
Regulatory headwinds gather
Neither proposal will glide through regulatory approval. Lawmakers on both sides of the Atlantic have flagged monopoly concerns, though the specifics differ sharply between the two deals. Netflix's partial acquisition faces questions about cinema exhibition—Sarandos endured pointed queries during a Washington hearing about theatrical windows and ticket pricing—whilst also raising eyebrows over potential streaming price increases for consumers already bleeding from subscription fatigue.
Paramount's bid carries its own political complications. The Ellison family's connections to the Trump administration have attracted scrutiny from Democratic lawmakers, adding an unpredictable variable to antitrust considerations. A combined Paramount-Warner Bros entity would control an enormous library of intellectual property, from DC Comics to Star Trek, alongside production facilities and distribution networks that span the globe.
The consolidation pressure driving this auction isn't unique to Warner Bros. Traditional media companies have watched Netflix, Amazon, and Apple deploy tech-company balance sheets to hoover up talent and content, forcing legacy players into an arms race they cannot win individually.
Disney's acquisition of 21st Century Fox in 2019 for $71bn established the template: get bigger or get marginalised.
What price survival
According to Luke Stillman, managing director at US media consultancy Madison and Wall, Warner Bros may be positioning for bids to reach $33 per share. Whether that figure represents realistic valuation or wishful thinking depends largely on how much strategic value the acquirer assigns to Warner Bros' assets versus the operational headaches of integration.
Hollywood studio and entertainment industry transformation
The Netflix deal, for all its appeal to shareholders seeking a premium exit, would leave the spun-off television and news assets in precarious condition. Linear TV advertising revenue continues its structural decline, and CNN's once-unassailable position in cable news has eroded significantly. Standalone, these businesses face brutal economics.
Paramount's approach preserves Warner Bros as an integrated entity, theoretically maintaining synergies between content production, distribution, and marketing. But integration success rates in media megamergers hardly inspire confidence. Time Warner's disastrous merger with AOL remains a cautionary tale, whilst even Disney's Fox acquisition produced significant write-downs and redundancies.
Warner Bros must now decide whether Netflix's willingness to pay for the crown jewels outweighs Paramount's commitment to the entire enterprise. The board's carefully worded statement suggests it will use Paramount's increased offer as leverage to extract better terms from Netflix, or push Paramount higher still. In an industry where content libraries represent centuries of creative output and billions in sunk costs, every dollar per share matters.
The outcome will likely reshape Hollywood's power structure for the next decade. Whichever deal ultimately closes will create a formidable competitor to the streaming duopoly of Netflix and Disney. For Warner Bros shareholders, the bidding war represents a rare moment of leverage in a consolidating market.
Multi-award winning serial entrepreneur and founder/CEO of Venntro Media Group, the company behind White Label Dating. Founded his first agency while at university in 1997. Awards include Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year (2013) and IoD Young Director of the Year (2014). Co-founder of Business Fortitude.